18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
2
3
Best position
#10
#1
#1
#2
Average position
10.0
1.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
64
23
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison