Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Primacy 5

e.Ziex

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

1

3

4

18

3

1

14

Best position

#10

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

10.0

3.3

12.0

6.1

4.7

3.7

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

40

111

47

126

34

64

706

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip Compact

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Primacy 5

e.Ziex

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison