Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

1

3

4

18

3

5

26

Best position

#10

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

10.0

3.3

12.0

6.1

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

42

40

111

47

34

63

66

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Compact

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison