18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
3
15
14
1
Best position
#10
#2
#2
#2
#1
Average position
10.0
3.7
9.0
5.5
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
34
225
706
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison