18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
2
10
3
Best position
#10
#1
#2
#2
Average position
10.0
1.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
23
104
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison