18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
1
2
13
4
Best position
#10
#1
#2
#3
Average position
10.0
1.0
6.2
12.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
23
530
111

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison