18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
14
15
Best position
#10
#8
#2
Average position
10.0
13.4
9.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
153
225

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Fuel efficiency
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison