Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

5

—

3

1

26

Best position

#1

—

#2

#1

Average position

2.2

—

3.3

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2025

—

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

63

123

40

64

66

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Offroad

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Interior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Price/value

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Costs

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison