Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

26

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

2.2

3.7

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

63

66

34

40

64

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Offroad

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Price/value

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Costs

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison