Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

16

3

1

3

5

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

4.7

3.3

1.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

126

40

64

34

63

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Interior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison