Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

WetProof

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

16

4

14

3

2

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

12.0

5.6

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2023

2025

2023

2025

Available sizes

153

111

47

34

23

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry steering response

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Nokian WetProof

63%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

WetProof

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison