18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
16
4
3
3
3
2
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
111
40
60
34
23

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison