Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

16

4

3

1

2

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

12.0

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2023

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

111

40

64

23

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison