18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
4
3
3
2
1
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
111
40
34
23
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison