18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
4
18
2
6
1
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#1
#3
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
6.1
1.0
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
111
47
23
146
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison