18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
16
4
6
3
2
3
Best position
#3
#3
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
5.5
12.0
4.7
3.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
111
146
34
23
40

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison