Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

16

4

3

1

3

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

5.5

12.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2023

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

153

111

34

40

64

60

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison