18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
16
4
3
6
2
3
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
5.5
12.0
3.7
4.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
111
34
146
23
40

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison