18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
4
2
3
6
3
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
Average position
5.5
12.0
1.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
111
23
40
146
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison