18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
4
2
3
1
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
1.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
111
23
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison