18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
10
4
3
18
1
Best position
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
6.0
12.0
3.7
6.1
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
153
104
111
34
47
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison