18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
10
3
18
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
6.0
3.3
6.1
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
104
40
47
60
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison