18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
10
18
4
3
1
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
6.0
6.1
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
104
47
111
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison