Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance

Kinergy 4S2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

16

4

3

1

Best position

#3

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

5.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2023

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

—

111

40

34

64

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Kinergy 4S2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison