18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
16
3
24
1
3
5
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
3.3
2.7
1.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
40
151
27
34
63

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison