18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
18
4
24
3
1
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
6.1
12.0
2.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
47
111
151
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison