18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
18
4
6
1
3
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
Average position
5.5
6.1
12.0
4.7
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
47
111
146
64
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison