18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
18
4
3
2
1
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
6.1
12.0
3.7
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
47
111
34
23
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison