18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
16
18
10
4
3
2
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
6.1
6.0
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
47
104
111
34
23

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison