18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
18
6
3
1
3
3
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
5.5
6.1
4.7
3.3
1.0
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
47
146
40
64
126
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison