18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
6
3
3
18
1
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
4.7
3.3
3.7
6.1
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
153
146
40
34
47
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison