18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
6
3
26
1
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
4.7
3.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
146
34
66
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison