18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
EcoContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
5
4
3
3
1
Best position
#3
#7
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
13.0
12.0
3.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2023
2022
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
676
111
34
40
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Fuel efficiency
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison