18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
4
10
3
6
1
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
#3
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
6.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
111
104
40
146
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison