18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
4
10
5
3
3
1
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
6.0
2.2
3.3
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
111
104
63
40
40
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison