18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
18
4
23
3
29
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
3.3
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
176
34
178

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison