18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
18
4
3
17
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#4
Average position
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.7
4.3
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
40
80
97

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison