18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

When comparing the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 summer tyres, the data from various tests reveal some distinct strengths and weaknesses for each.


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scored an impressive 87% overall in our tests. This tire is a successor to the previous model, Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. Notable strengths of this tyre include its high mileage and good comfort levels, according to Autobild's test where it scored a position of 18 out of 51. However, a slightly average aquaplaning resistance and extended dry braking were pointed out as areas for improvement. Despite its high price level, ADAC placed the tyre in the top position in their 50-tyre test, praising its mileage.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, which replaced the Ecsta HS51, received an overall rating of 81% in our tests. This touring summer tyre displayed impressive features such as dry braking and handling, wet braking, and good price/value ratio, with Autobild ranking it in third place out of 51 tyres in their test. Additionally, the tyre showed good dry and wet performance, low wear, and low fuel consumption according to ADAC. However, they did note some weaknesses in aquaplaning behavior and it's high weight.


When looking at the comparison of these two tyres' test results, one can note that in some tests the Kumho Ecsta HS52 managed to outperform the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, such as in Vibilagare’s test where the HS52 scored a position of 3, outpacing the Performance 2 which came in the 4th position out of nine tyres in the test. However, in other tests like at ADAC, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 clearly outshines its Kumho counterpart by securing the first place, as opposed to the 8th rank of the HS52.


Overall, comparing these two tyres highlights the specific strengths and weaknesses of each making the decision related to purchase a matter of personal preference and specific needs.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
18
10
21
14
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#8
Average position
6.1
6.0
11.9
13.4
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
47
104
164
153

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison