18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

If you're looking for a comprehensive comparison between the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4, you've come to the right place. These two tyres are summer-type, with the Hankook model a touring subtype.


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, successor of the Efficient Grip Performance model, excels in a number of tests, scoring an overall rating of 87%. Standing 4th and 18th in Vibilagare and Autobild tests respectively, its strengths include high mileage, price-value, comfort, dry and wet handling.

However, according to TyreReviews.com, the Goodyear tyre displays average aquaplaning resistance and longer dry braking time. AutoBild draws attention to its high price level.


In contrast, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, following the Ventus Prime3 K125 model, has an overall rating of 85%. Excels especially in the Autobild test where it secured the 2nd position. It shows excellent control in dry and wet conditions, including aquaplaning resistance, dry braking and handling, and wet braking. Additionally, the tyre provides lower exterior noise.


However, the drawbacks of the Hankook tyre are its average mileage and lower efficiency according to TyreReviews.com, as well as ADAC tests. Autobild's review highlights that comfort is average.


In summary, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 may impress you with its balanced performance, comfort, lower noise and good mileage, provided that you don’t mind higher prices and average aquaplaning resistance. On the other hand, Hankook Ventus Prime 4 wins in terms of handling in both wet and dry conditions, reduced exterior noise, and excellent dry and wet braking, even though its comfort and efficiency could be improved.


Looking at the mutual test positions, the Goodyear tyre triumphs in the Vibilagare and ADAC tests, whereas Hankook outperforms in the Autobild test.


Each of the tyres has its advantages and areas for improvement, so keep your specific needs and preferences in mind when making your choice between the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.


As both tyre models are current, there are no replacement models to be mentioned for either.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
13
3
4
5
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
6.2
3.3
12.0
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
530
40
111
63
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison