18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
18
1
3
16
6
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#3
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
1.0
3.3
5.5
4.7
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2023
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
64
40
153
146
126
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison