18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Let's compare two prominent summer tyre models: The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the Fulda EcoControl HP2. Both are successors to popular models and have shown significant developments over their predecessors.


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, belonging to Goodyear, ranked notably good in diverse tyre tests and exceled with an excellent overall rating of 87%. This tyre stood 13th in the 53-tyre Autobild test. Its best features as per varied test feedbacks include superior mileage, commendable price-value ratio and a remarkable level of comfort. This model doesn't have a noted successor yet. It replaces the former Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance.


The Fulda EcoControl HP2 from Fulda, performed relatively well in a wide array of tests, attaining an overall rating of 79%. It was placed 20th out of 53 tyres by Autobild testing and 8th in the ADAC test. This tyre is particularly praised for its exterior noise level, being quieter-than-average, and for its aptitude in cross aquaplaning scenarios. However, it was noted to have certain weaknesses on wet roads. The EcoControl HP2 is a successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP model.


In Autobild's test, the Efficient Grip Performance 2 beats the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in overall ranking. It also fared better in the ADAC test, standing 4th compared to Fulda’s 8th position, furthering its standings as a more overall dependable summer tyre.


In conclusion, both tyres have their unique strengths and succeed in different categories. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to have an upper hand in mileage, price-value ratio, and comfort, making it a beneficial choice for long commutes and daily drivers. On the other hand, Fulda EcoControl HP2's more silent running and better aquaplaning characteristics may come in handy for specific terrain and preference requirements. While a mutual comparison of the two puts Goodyear ahead, the verdict fundamentally depends on individual driving needs.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
18
8
4
2
3
Best position
#1
#4
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
12.8
12.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
30
111
23
40

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison