Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Number of tests

18

3

7

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

3.7

3.3

2.4

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

34

40

60

137

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

94%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

92%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

80%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

86%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

84%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

95%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

63%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

71%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

72%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

64%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

66%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison