18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and Continental PremiumContact 6 are top-reviewed summer tyres from respective top manufacturers, Goodyear and Continental. These have been a subject of multiple tests, frequently ending in top positions, providing reliable and excellent performance.


Based on our ratings, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 has a score of 84% while the Continental PremiumContact 6 scores a very close 83%.


In ADAC's test, out of 15 tyres, the PremiumContact 6 claimed the first position presenting exemplary wet braking and wet handling, while the Goodyear tyre placed fourth. Although in the GTÜ test the positions were flipped (Goodyear ended 9th and Continental 6th out of 9 tested tyres), Goodyear excelled in dry handling, exterior noise, and wet performances, Continental showcased slightly better with strengths consisting of characteristics like dry and wet handling and braking.


In a comprehensive test by Autobild that evaluated 53 tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 achieved an impressive position for its value, comfort, and mileage, syncing in tremendous harmony with Continental that held the 4th position for its superb wet braking.


In Teknikens test, Goodyear took the second position out of 10 tyres tested, outperforming Continental, which ended up as fourth. However, Continental still managed to leave an impressive mark with its wet braking feature.


Nonetheless, it should be noted that the Continental PremiumContact 6 has gotten replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7. Therefore, users looking for the very latest model might want to consider tyre's successor.


To summarize, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses. The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 stands out in terms of dry and wet handling and excels in comfort and value for the price; on the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6 undoubtedly shines with its wet performance and safety-associated braking, whether on dry or wet surfaces. Therefore, either of these can be a great choice depending on personal preference and primary needs.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
36
3
5
1
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
3.1
3.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
296
34
63
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Fuel efficiency
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison