18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the BFGoodrich Advantage are two reliable and quality summer tyres. The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 has replaced the previous model, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. As a replacement, the Efficient Grip Performance 2 tyre comes with improved features and earns an excellent rating of 87%. You can find out more about this tyre here. Visit the Goodyear's website for more on their products.


On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage, known for its fuel efficiency, achieves a commendable rating of 76%. To know more about this tyre, click here. For more tyre products and information, visit the BFGoodrich's website.


Both tyres have shown respectable performance in mutual tests. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 stands out in terms of mileage, comfort and price-value ratio, according to Autobild test. It performed well in tests by ADAC, Autozeitung, GTÜ and Firmenauto, achieving a position within the top ten. Its strengths include short braking distances, high mileage and dry handling. Its downside is the relatively high price level.


The BFGoodrich Advantage displays effective dry handling and much appreciated comfort. It scored well for its fuel efficiency according to the ADAC test. The tyre's dry handling was dynamic with low rolling resistance and quiet rolling noise according to Autobild 2024. However, the tyre shows a tendency for understeering in wet conditions.


In summary, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage in overall test results, given its higher rating and impressive features. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage offers solid performance, particularly if your main concern is fuel efficiency or a lower price tag.


Keep in mind that the choice of a tyre depends on your particular driving and weather conditions as well as personal preferences. Make sure to consider all factors before making a decision.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
18
14
3
3
2
Best position
#1
#8
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
13.4
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
153
40
34
23

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison