18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the BFGoodrich Advantage are two reliable and quality summer tyres. The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 has replaced the previous model, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. As a replacement, the Efficient Grip Performance 2 tyre comes with improved features and earns an excellent rating of 87%. You can find out more about this tyre here. Visit the Goodyear's website for more on their products.


On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage, known for its fuel efficiency, achieves a commendable rating of 76%. To know more about this tyre, click here. For more tyre products and information, visit the BFGoodrich's website.


Both tyres have shown respectable performance in mutual tests. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 stands out in terms of mileage, comfort and price-value ratio, according to Autobild test. It performed well in tests by ADAC, Autozeitung, GTÜ and Firmenauto, achieving a position within the top ten. Its strengths include short braking distances, high mileage and dry handling. Its downside is the relatively high price level.


The BFGoodrich Advantage displays effective dry handling and much appreciated comfort. It scored well for its fuel efficiency according to the ADAC test. The tyre's dry handling was dynamic with low rolling resistance and quiet rolling noise according to Autobild 2024. However, the tyre shows a tendency for understeering in wet conditions.


In summary, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage in overall test results, given its higher rating and impressive features. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage offers solid performance, particularly if your main concern is fuel efficiency or a lower price tag.


Keep in mind that the choice of a tyre depends on your particular driving and weather conditions as well as personal preferences. Make sure to consider all factors before making a decision.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
18
14
14
15
3
Best position
#1
#8
#9
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
13.4
19.7
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
153
145
225
40

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Cooper Zeon CS8
43%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Fuel efficiency
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison