18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Falken Azenis FK510

6 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, successor to the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, and the Falken Azenis FK510 are two top-tier summer tyres manufactured by Goodyear and Falken respectively. Both models have proven merits in terms of performance and reliability, but they also exhibit distinct strengths and weaknesses.


The GoodYear model, manufactured in Slovenia and Germany, earned an overall rating of 85% in our assessments. Its performance in separate road tests was impressive, clinching the first position in the Autozeitung, AutoMotorSport and Autobild tests, and second and third positions in the Gute-Fahrt and ADAC tests respectively. Notably, this tyre exceled in handling, both in dry and wet conditions, as well as in aquaplaning resistance and mileage. However, this model has been replaced by a newer version, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.


On the other hand, the Falken model is manufactured in Japan and Turkey and scored a respectable 74% in our evaluations. It placed sixth in the Autobild test and fifth in the Autozeitung test, but fell down to eighth place in both the AutoMotorSport and ADAC tests. This tyre performed notably well in wet conditions, with excellent wet braking and handling capabilities. Other notable strengths include low exterior noise and rolling resistance. Despite these solid attributes, this tyre has also been succeeded by the Falken Azenis FK520.


As such, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 generally outperformed the Falken Azenis FK510 in terms of test results and our overall ratings. Its strong showing in different road tests, as well as high marks on various key attributes, elucidate why it is amongst the most preferred summer tyre choice for drivers. On the other hand, the Falken tyre shows solid and reliable performance despite not being quite as decorated.


In conclusion, both the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Falken Azenis FK510 deliver reliable performance and offer specific strengths. The choice between the two will likely depend on individual driver's preferences, particularly regarding noise levels and wet weather handling.

Test Profile

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Falken
Azenis FK510
Number of tests
15
29
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
2.3
5.4
Latest test
2022
2022
Available sizes
187
125

Performance comparison

Averaged from 6 tests

Wet Performance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
84%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Wet Braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
Falken Azenis FK510
82%
Wet Handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Wet Circle Cornering
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Falken Azenis FK510
68%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
82%
Falken Azenis FK510
77%
Aquaplaning Cross
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Falken Azenis FK510
72%
Dry Performance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Falken Azenis FK510
71%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Dry Braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Dry Handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
Falken Azenis FK510
66%
Dry Lane Change
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Dry Steering Reaction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Falken Azenis FK510
59%
Comfort & Noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
78%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Falken Azenis FK510
70%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Noise Exterior
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Noise Interior
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
78%
Falken Azenis FK510
65%
Ride Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%
Falken Azenis FK510
71%
Economy
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
83%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Falken Azenis FK510
72%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Rolling Resistance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
68%
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Fuel Efficiency
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Falken Azenis FK510
84%
Mileage
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Falken Azenis FK510
64%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021255/35 R19View
AutozeitungAutozeitung
Summer
2021225/40 R18View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Summer
2020225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2020245/45 R18View
ADACADAC
Summer
2020225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison