18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodride
Solmax 1
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
17
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
1.7
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
46
80
34

Wet

Wet
Goodride Solmax 1
49%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Goodride Solmax 1
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodride Solmax 1
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Goodride Solmax 1
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison