18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
3
3
Best position
#9
#2
#2
Average position
9.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
60
34

Wet

Wet
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Offroad

Offroad
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%

Comfort

Comfort
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison