Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

General

Tire Grabber GT Plus

VS

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Tire Grabber GT Plus

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

1

3

Best position

#9

#1

#2

Average position

9.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2023

2025

Available sizes

64

34

Wet

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Offroad

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Comfort

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

60%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

53%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Tire Grabber GT Plus

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison