Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

General

Tire Grabber GT Plus

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

2

5

3

1

3

Best position

#9

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

9.0

2.2

3.7

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2023

2025

2026

Available sizes

64

63

34

64

40

Wet

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet braking

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - cross

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Offroad

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Grass traction

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Gravel traction

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Comfort

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Dry

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison